Trust
Read the source, follow the finding and know the limits of the check.
Start with the evidence available to inspect today, then the handling terms that must be established before client work begins.
These checked-in examples use synthetic material. Each links its input or output to a recording that states what ran and what remained outside the check.
Two sample Chambers Reports, built from synthetic briefs, show the finding index, per-finding cards and annotated source passages that a check returns.
Dated September 2026 builds. They show what a check returns; they do not measure performance on other drafts.
A quotation in a synthetic complaint is checked against one supplied source. The output preserves the comparison and the limits of that run.
No retrieval, legal-relevance review or live model evaluation ran.
The council recording shows how supplied source passages and independent readings are assessed and combined into an advisory result.
The reader answers are authored. The rule results are recorded; they do not measure live AI accuracy.
Last verified: Pending publication
Evidence pending publication. No product-wide test count, blind-corpus result or false-accusation rate is claimed here.
Published as a static snapshot at build time. The verification timestamp identifies its age; this is not a live monitor.
Copy reviewed October 20, 2026. No dated, release-specific obstacle or adversarial result is published here. Each measured statement must identify the corpus version, tested commit, result and test date before publication.
A result on an internal test set applies to that set and release. It is not a guarantee for other drafts or sources. Capability descriptions explain what Aletheia is designed to detect; counsel must inspect the evidence and review the findings.
The hosted product is designed as a browser-based service hosted on our own dedicated infrastructure. This is design intent, not a current service guarantee. The handling below is a basis for the access conversation; agreed terms must identify the actual services and controls before onboarding.
Access requires a documented account of firm and user isolation, access controls, encryption and key management, backup and restoration, incident response, retention and deletion. The recorded demonstrations above establish none of those controls.
Preserving the history of a working matter is different from handling an account closure or deletion request. The agreement must explain time periods, exceptions, backup treatment and who is responsible for each step.
The Chambers Report says what could not be checked and what counsel needs to supply. It does not turn an unsuccessful lookup into a claim that a case is invented.
Approved documents will be linked here. Reserved slots show where a document is still pending; no legal text has been drafted for those.